Friday, September 05, 2008

Super Dooper flop- KUSELAN

I should definitely write something about this horrible film I saw very recently.
I brought the rental (illegal) DVD with lot of excitements, which ended up in a huge disappointment. I don know what happened to Rajini for choosing this role in this most stupid movie. What has happened to the director vasu? I think we should definitely ask the director to consult some doctor. If somebody has got a copyright of some movie, its not sin if he exactly copies the story! Every one wants to give their directorial touch to it. They should definitely stop or they should not remake a movie. When we take the jeyam ravi and his bro, they usually do the exact copy of the movie. But that never lets them down. That’s their secret of success. Only very slight changes will be made. The story will be the same.
Ok, let’s see some more things in depth about kuselan.
Who is the main lead in the movie?? Pasupathi or rajini.
Actually it should have been pasupathi. Coz, the whole story is about a saloon guy, who being a friend of a big cinema star, living so simple and never wanted to ask for help. He always wanted to stand in his own leg, never said anyone about his friend or the help he did to his friend. Rajini should have come only for some time. Might be he should have shown only from the last frame of the first half, as in the Malayalam version. Some scenes like, chandramuki-2, aejaman-2, etc are so stupid. They should have avoided those scenes. At least rajini shouldn’t have accepted for them.

What is the role for nayanthara??
She is a total waste in the movie. No dialogues for her. She just comes for couple of scenes as heroines and shows off. That’s all. She shouldn’t have agreed for the role. But who cares?? All the heroines will say it’s a role opposite to rajini why should we miss such a great opportunity!

Who is the costume designer??
I should also mention this. If u consider the costume of all the others in the movie, it’s not that bad. But what the hell they planned for meena?? She is performing the role of a very poor house wife. How can she be wearing all new sarees, that too all expensive ones? Didn’t they see the logic behind it? Pasupathi was given right costume. They should have concentrated in meena’s costume too!

What the hell vadivelu and his “so called” wife in the movie doing in the movie??
That was one of the worst aspects of the movie. His comedy was not at all needed. He was just doing some crap. That should have been avoided. The scene in which he will be watching his wife thru the window was the peak of non-sense. The director has lost his mind it seems. It’s better for him to join as assistant director to some great directors and start learning.

Only some percentage of the films was good. Let me also list them
1. Pasupathi’s acting was very good. In the scenes, where he struggles to find money for his business and for the family, his acting was showing his maturity in acting that he has acquired. He should be patted at his back for this effort.
2. Climax was little good. That too, only that speech. It was written well. So I would say there was some relief for the audience to see some good scenes at the least at the end of the movie.
3. Music. G.V.Prakash was doing all good in the movie. Couple of songs was very good. Saaral song was very good with beats and the song in which Pasupathi sings with his family was good in melody. Back ground could have been given some more importance. Coz that will give some more life to this dead screenplay.


All together, the movie was total unexpected flop and next time, everyone who acted in this movie should think before committing. If not, they will definitely miss their future in cinema industry altogether. I, as a representative of the whole Tamil nadu, kindly request the director not to experiment his stupid ideas with good actors and producers. Better he can try with his son, so that only his family is making the mistake.

No comments:

Powered By Blogger